Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Whew! What a Relief.

In the last 10 weeks I have read all of this:

Plus the 3 books I didn't buy.

And written over 100 pages of essays.

Tomorrow morning I take my last final and attend my last class, and I'm officially done with my first quarter of grad school. And then it's off to Utah for Christmas! Yep. I'm grinning.

Monday, December 7, 2009

Economics and Basketball

If you thought the title didn't go together, you'll be surprised. Props to Prof. Joe Price and Henry Tappen for their work that was written about on ESPN.com testing whether or not some of Tim Donaghy's allegations are true. [For those of you who may not have followed the story, Tim Donaghy is a referee who gambled on basketball games, for which he was fired and jailed. He claimed in a tell-all book that the NBA tries to manipulate the outcomes of games through officiating.] I used to work for Dr. Price and am currently working with him on another research project; I have been in a bunch of classes with Henry. And yes, a BYU professor is doing research about gambling ... but, shockingly enough, shows that gambling is a losing proposition.

Friday, December 4, 2009

On Becoming an "Expert"

Malcolm Gladwell's book Outliers** explains why some people are successful, and why others aren't. He says that these "outliers" aren't born geniuses, their circumstances and hard work combine to bring them success. How much work? About 10,000 hours. Obviously, natural ability is important, but without practice your abilities don't mean a whole lot. The reason that Bill Gates was so brilliant with computers and successful with Microsoft is that he sneaked out of his bedroom as a kid to the University of Washington Computer lab to practice coding in the middle of the night. The Beatles were so incredible because they played 12 hour sets nearly every day at a club in Germany before they hit it big.

The point is, once you have done it for 10,000 hours you are generally one of the best people at [insert whatever skill you practiced here], you can be unofficially qualified as an "expert." This got us talking about the kinds of things we will be expert in by the end of our lives.

-It turns out, that if you work 40 hours a week for 5 years, that's 10,000 hours. And approximately the same amount of time it will take to earn our PhDs. Sadly, right now we're working way more than 40 hours a week--so I guess that means we get to be "uber-experts" or something.

-Daniel says he's already an expert at watching football. Lisa believes that.

-Lisa claims to be an expert dishwasher. That's what happens when you didn't have a dishwasher while growing up. But it sure is nice to have one now. That's one expert skill that it isn't sad to see go to waste.

-Even though he plays the piano fairly well, Daniel is not an expert pianist. His mother will tell you that is because he never practiced enough to make it to 10,000 hours. She knows because she tried to make him practice for 8 years with very limited success (due to no fault of her own).

-Lisa is also an expert napper. Or hopes to be. Wouldn't that be great? 10,000 hours of napping in your life? Mmmm....

So...what kinds of things are you an expert at?

PS: Happy 100th Post!

**I [Daniel] have to insert my plug here. This is easily one of the most interesting easy reads I've ever come across. If you haven't read it, you should. I promise. It will change the way you think about success, and it's really entertaining.

Monday, November 30, 2009

It's nice to get away.

Daniel and I had a FANTASTIC Thanksgiving. We spent the weekend in Lovelock, NV at my grandma's house. The whole family came--turns out Lovelock is a pretty good halfway point for most of us. It was great to just spend a few days seeing cousins, playing card games, eating, and not reading. Dan is still grinning from the three days straight he spent watching football. He likes that a) BYU won, b) he actually got to watch the game (not just listen to it), and c) there were other people around to watch it with.

I forgot to charge my camera, so thanks for the pictures, Dad! A few more funny ones can be found on Steve and Kat's blog.

Dan spent the whole holiday right here. He couldn't have been happier.

I spent most of the holiday right here. I couldn't have been happier either. It's good to have so many people to play games with. Rummy doesn't work very well with just two of us.

15 people for Thanksgiving dinner! Plus lots of other relatives who dropped in throughout the week.
Thanks for letting us come, Grandma!

Friday, November 20, 2009

Structured Procrastination

I've been looking for ways to help me manage my time better as a graduate student. I do an ok job of staying on top of things, but there sure is a lot more that I could be doing better. I stumbled across this essay* that describes the only reason that I ever accomplish anything (at least go to the link and read the first paragraph so you'll know what I'm talking about, you link non-clickers). I've been doing it subconsciously for years, and have only now had someone explain it to me. On top of that he's a Stanford philsophy professor, so it makes me feel like this plan is academically justified. So now that I've written on the blog, maybe I'll work on that problem set ...

*Don't be scared by the word essay, it's relatively short and pretty funny.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Why I am not a Feminist.

I can point directly to the day I first realized I was not a feminist.

I was a junior in high school, debating at the Alta debate tournament with my wonderful partner Rachel. In one round, two guys got up and won the round (by running a kritik on us--we were the neg, still mad about that) by telling us that women are oppressed, and that we were further oppressing them by saying "fishermen" instead of using the gender-neutral term "fisherperson". I have never before or since felt oppressed because of my status as a woman. But I did then. Two men were telling me that me and my woman partner were oppressed, and using that knowledge to therefore stifle our success in the tournament.

Sure, I get bugged by little things sometimes. As we were moving out to California, a lot of well-intentioned people would ask about our move with questions like "Oh, is your husband going to school? What's he going into?" without ever asking what I was going to do or even realizing that we could both go to school together.

I also get annoyed when my professors or other students single me out to comment because "we haven't heard much from the girls today." Or because most of the other girls in my program don't speak English as a first language, so they expect me to pick up the slack for our whole gender.

But I am not a feminist. And here is why I realized it this week.

I read an entire book chapter about the great contributions feminist scholars have given to the study of gender and politics. And I hated it. The whole thing ASSUMED that what women want is "equality," by which they mean we are treated identically to men. They ASSUME (it was never explicitly stated) that women will be less oppressed if they can get out of the stifling home environment and into the political world. In essence, when women are treated just like men, we will be less oppressed.

I strongly disagree. I firmly believe that men and women have different roles, but that those differences do not automatically signal inequality. I spent last night at a Relief Society activity
with forty or so of the strongest, most driven and accomplished women I have ever met. Some work outside the home, some work within their homes. Some have advanced degrees, others do not. Some are expecting new children, some are expecting new grandchildren. All are trying to develop themselves and their talents. But to look at that room, you would be hard-pressed to find one of them who feels that she cannot do whatever she wants, and whatever the Lord asks of her, because she is a woman.

More importantly, I do NOT WANT to be treated as equally as men. I expect to be treated BETTER. I want doors opened for me. I would appreciate having a seat on a crowded bus. I absolutely expect a higher standard in the language and topics discussed around me. I do not want to be drafted. I am thrilled by the fact that I can choose whether or not to work outside the home. I love my schoolwork and the opportunity, but I certainly prefer the work in the home and the unique satisfaction it brings to the long hours of studying and essays.

My big problem with feminists is that they have it exactly backwards, and that their efforts to make the genders identical actually disadvantages me in my pursuit of the privilege of being a wife and mother. I have no desire to give up my elevated status and become identical to men.

It is, of course, important to distinguish what I mean by "feminsim": I recognize that feminism, especially in it's historical role, has had undeniable positive impacts on the world and my life. I wholeheartedly support equality between the sexes. I do, however, feel that some modern feminist movements make the mistake of defining equality not merely as equality of opportunity, but of outcome. I support anyone who attempts to break down structural barriers or systemic oppression, but do not feel that behavior between men and women must be identical for equality to be achieved. It is only where the movement changes from structures and opportunities to behaviors and outcomes that I begin to take objection.